The information on this page was correct at the time of publishing (July 2023). The project has since evolved and we would encourage you to read our September update for more information.
Here are some key statistics about our consultation:
45,595
invitations mailed
147,946
impressions from online advertising
Five
public events
Two
webinars
4,624
visits to consultation portal
641
pieces of written feedback
Issues and actions from the consultation
A wide range of issues were raised during the statutory consultation that will be addressed either via further consultation and engagement or in the Environmental Statement and Consultation Report. This is a high level summary of a number of the most commonly raised issues and what actions the project is taking to address them.
Issue raised during consultation
Offshore
What we are doing
Issue raised during consultation
Visual impact of the turbines
People were concerned about the visual impact of the wind farm, particularly from the Suffolk coast, and any tourism or seascape impacts.
What we are doing
North Falls has decided to remove the northern array which was the section of the project that was closest to shore and where the turbines would have potentially been most visible. This means the closest turbine to shore will no longer be 22 kilometres but rather 42 kilometres, which will significantly reduce what people onshore will be able to see.
Removal of the northern array will also reduce the offshore footprint, alleviating concerns from the shipping sector and reducing the impact on birds.
Issue raised during consultation
Visual impact of the turbines-size of the turbines
A number of responses felt the maximum turbine sizes included in the proposals were too large and would impact visually.
What we are doing
The maximum height of the turbines has been reduced by 20 metres (from 397m to 377m) and the maximum number of turbines likewise has been reduced by 15 (from 72 to 57). Combined with the removal of the northern array, the reduction in turbine height and number should alleviate most of people’s concerns around visibility.
Issue raised during consultation
Offshore grid connection
The majority of consultation responses stated a preference for North Falls to have a grid connection offshore, rather than the proposed onshore grid connection in Ardleigh, primarily due to its link to National Grid’s proposed Norwich-Tilbury reinforcement project.
What we are doing
North Falls continues to play an active role in the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero’s Offshore Transmission Network Review (OTNR) with other key stakeholders involved in the delivery of offshore wind and remains committed to include an offshore grid connection option within the development consent order application we submit to the Planning Inspectorate.
Issue raised during consultation
Number of export cable circuits required (offshore)
Consultees with a marine focus questioned the need for four circuits for the offshore export cables, as initially proposed by both North Falls and neighbouring Five Estuaries.
What we are doing
Both North Falls and Five Estuaries have carried out additional design and engineering work and concluded that the projects can progress with two circuits each.
Offshore this will mean fewer cables on the seabed, reducing shipping and navigation concerns. It also means both projects can potentially utilise the same landfall location, and reduces the onshore construction impacts considerably due to reduced working widths (more details under onshore below).
Landfall
Issue raised during consultation
Landfall construction compound
A preference was for North Falls’ landfall construction compound to be located away from the Holland Haven marshes and site of special scientific interest (SSSI) and to keep disturbance to Frinton Golf Club and beach huts to a minimum.
What we are doing
North Falls will place its construction compound to the east of Kirby Brook. It will avoid Holland Haven Marshes and be outside of the SSSI. This location means that the cables will no longer go underneath Frinton beach huts. Horizontal directional drilling will be used under the golf club, with the construction compound placed to the edge of its western end to reduce impacts. The decision from North Falls means the construction compound will now be closer to Five Estuaries announced preferred landfall (the northern option presented in its statutory consultation). This gives greater opportunity for the projects to coordinate landfall works.
Onshore
Issue raised during consultation
Number of export cable circuits required (onshore)
Consultees, including many landowners, questioned the need for four circuits per project for the onshore export cables, as initially proposed by both North Falls and neighbouring Five Estuaries.
What we are doing
As with offshore, the onshore export cable circuits will also be reduced from four per project to two per project. This will decrease the overall footprint of the cable corridor, reduce the impacts on land take and the environment. It will result in reduced widths of the cable corridor during construction and the legal easement post-construction.
Issue raised during consultation
Onshore cable corridor width during construction
Consultation responses asked that both North Falls and Five Estuaries reduce the number of export cable circuits and consequently the width of their combined onshore construction cable corridor.
What we are doing
Having reduced the number of export cable circuits from four to two, per project, this also means the proposed combined onshore cable corridor will predominantly be 90 metres rather than the originally proposed up to 250 metres. This allows for soil storage, internal haul roads and possible micro-siting plus flexibility for use of horizontal directional drilling (HDD) under constraints, such as roads. There is ongoing work to identify the final combined construction cable corridor which may lead to further refinements.
Issue raised during consultation
Onshore cable corridor alignment with Five Estuaries
As well as requesting a narrower cable corridor, consultation responses also asked or North Falls and Five Estuaries to more fully align their onshore cable route so as to minimise the local impacts.
What we are doing
The cable corridor for both projects is now almost fully aligned along its length, and joint work is ongoing around both the route and the future planning in terms of construction. The projects have signed a ‘good neighbour agreement’ which enables greater cooperation, coordination and transparency as the projects head towards submission of their development consent order applications.
Issue raised during consultation
Construction traffic
Responses expressed concern about potential increases in traffic due to the construction of the project, particularly bringing attention to narrow local roads, already limited cycling and walking tracks and existing congestion.
What we are doing
North Falls PEIR Chapter 27 Traffic and Transport includes measures to reduce the effects of construction traffic upon local roads. When we submit our application, it will be accompanied by an Outline Construction Traffic Management Plan which will detail these measures such as: how HGV movements will be controlled, monitored and enforced; a ‘Travel Plan’ to manage the number of single occupancy car trips; restriction of HGV movements through Thorpe-le-Soken; use of a temporary haul road along the onshore cable route to reduce the need for vehicles to travel via the public highway; and use of trenchless techniques to cross roads wherever possible to reduce the need for temporary road closures. To ensure safety of cyclists we are also assessing options for a cycle path.
Issue raised during consultation
Size of onshore substation
While noting that the majority of respondents stated a preference for the offshore grid connection option, in the event of an onshore grid connection there were numerous queries about the amount of land required for the onshore substation.
What we are doing
North Falls consulted based on a substation footprint of eight hectares. Taking into account the consultation feedback, and also given further engineering design studies, this has now been reduced by two hectares to a total of six.
Issue raised during consultation
Thorpe-le-Soken cable route options
As part of the consultation North Falls included a northern, central and southern option for the cable corridor near the village of Thorpe-le-Soken and asked the community for their preferred route.
What we are doing
Having reviewed the consultation feedback, undertaken further engineering design and re-assessed ways to mitigate potential impacts on the community, environment and residential properties, the southern route will now be progressed. This route is closest to Thorpe-le-Soken village and was selected because it is outside the Hamford Water Special Protection Area (SPA), and is more linear therefore will better enable creation of a continuous haul road within the corridor, which will help to reduce construction traffic impacts locally.
Issue raised during consultation
Construction management
A number of responses mentioned disruption during construction as an issue of concern. North Falls was also asked whether it would produce a Code of Construction Practice (equivalent to a Construction Management Plan) to include the measures that contractors will be required to adhere to during construction.
What we are doing
North Falls will now produce an outline version of this document for the project’s development consent order application. The outline will cover a large range of topics including how the effects from dust, noise, light, air quality, water/pollutant management, waste, and so on will be mitigated. It will be publicly available and will include details of how to raise a query regarding non-compliance of any of the contactors during construction.
Issue raised during consultation
Private water supplies
Responses from local residents made points with regard to the potential effects of the development of the project upon private water supplies, in particular in the Little Bromley area.
What we are doing
As part of the project’s environmental impact assessment, a hydrogeological risk assessment will be undertaken to identify any private water supplies potentially at risk during the project’s construction. Once they have been identified, mitigation measures will be developed and presented within the North Falls Environmental Statement submitted with the project’s development consent order application.
Issue raised during consultation
Onshore ecology
There were general concerns expressed within the consultation responses around impacts of the project on local onshore ecology such as trees, hedgerows, habitats and birds and fauna.
What we are doing
North Falls has committed to at least 10% biodiversity net gain across the onshore area, which will lead to an overall increase in habitats through the project’s lifetime. Following consultation, it has been confirmed that the development of the North Falls biodiversity net gain proposals will tie in with Essex County Council’s Green Infrastructure Strategy. They will be secured through an Ecological Management Plan that is now being prepared.
Project-wide
Issue raised during consultation
Community benefits
North Falls received input and questions around how the project could benefit the communities likely to be impacted by construction works or by the longer term infrastructure, for example via potential legacy projects or funds.
What we are doing
The project acknowledges the expectation of the local community around potential benefits and there are ongoing discussions on potential options and ways to ensure they are anchored within the community. Local consultation will be held on this issue once the development consent order is approved, to develop a plan in partnership with those communities directly impacted.
Issue raised during consultation
Local health services
There were some concerns around pressure being put onto the local health services because of a potential influx of workers during the project’s construction.
What we are doing
North Falls will undertake a Health Impact Assessment, in line with the advice and best practice published by Public Health England. This assessment will consider the potential increase in demand on all healthcare services in the areas surrounding the proposed development, as well as the effects on other health factors. It will be published as part of the project’s Environmental Statement.
To find out answers to all the key questions from the consultation please visit the ‘frequently asked questions’ page on the North Falls website
Frequently asked questions
Our main frequently asked questions page includes answers to many of the questions that were asked at this consultation, as well as others which have been asked throughout our development process. If you can't see an answer to a question you have, please send it to us directly via one of the methods on the contact us page.
Feedback form responses
The responses received via the completed feedback forms have been summarised and can be viewed in a number of ways. You can either view them online here or they can be downloaded as a PDF via the button below.
Download feedback form response summary